What California’s Busiest DC Fast-Charging ZIP Codes Reveal About EV Demand

California remains the nation’s DC fast-charging (DCFC) pace-setter. When a ZIP code consistently racks up an outsized share of fast-charging sessions, it’s rarely a fluke—it’s a signal that local EV adoption is high, daily driving is intense, and public fast charging is solving a real, everyday need.

Our Methodology

Using Paren session data for Q3 2025 (July 1–September 30), we identified the ZIP codes with 3 or more stations generating the most DCFC activity across the state . The result is a short list of true hotspots—places where charging demand is concentrated enough to reveal how Californians are actually fueling their EVs. We’ll share the top ZIPs below (100k+ sessions), but the bigger story is what these hotspots tell us about market maturity and where DCFC demand is headed next.

‍

Takeaways from California’s DCFC hotspots

1. Session volume by ZIP is a strong signal of market maturity

Big DCFC session totals usually show up where EV adoption is already mainstream. High-volume ZIPs reflect markets with a large base of BEV drivers on the road, well-developed charging networks (we filtered to ZIPs with ≥3 active stations), and repeat, everyday charging behavior—not just occasional road-trip use.

That pattern is clear at the top of the list: San Diego’s 92108 ranks #1 and Milpitas’ 95035 ranks #2, and their session totals are surprisingly close, even though Milpitas is denser (~6k people/sq mi vs. San Diego’s ~4k). Mature, high-activity ZIPs can generate similar volume for different reasons—density helps, but maturity and daily utilization are what keep volumes consistently high.

What this tells us: session volume isn’t just measuring chargers—it’s measuring how established the local EV market is.

2. Busy ZIPs usually point to a home-charging gap (not just “lots of EVs”)

High DCFC volume often means drivers in that area rely on public fast charging more frequently—because private charging is limited or inconvenient. That tends to happen when home charging is hard or unavailable (apartments, condos, street parking, older housing stock, smaller garages), or when home charging exists but doesn’t cover daily life (long commutes, work driving, or faster turnaround needs).

So when ZIPs like Santa Monica (90404) or San Mateo (94403) show up near the top, the story isn’t just “EVs are popular here.” It’s: public DC fast charging is serving everyday fueling needs.

What this tells us: these ZIPs are where adding DCFC is most likely to relieve pressure immediately.

3. The biggest hotspots likely include high-utilization drivers and corridor traffic

The highest-session ZIPs aren’t only serving local residents. Many sit near retail hubs, job centers, and major arteries, which attract rideshare drivers charging multiple times per day, delivery and service fleets, and regional corridor travel where drivers top up en route.

That kind of repeat, heavy-use charging can push a ZIP into the top tier even beyond what local BEV ownership alone would suggest.

What this tells us: the busiest ZIP codes are often charging destinations for a broader area—so demand planning needs to account for travel and commercial use, not just local adoption.

Conclusion

California’s busiest DCFC ZIP codes in Q3 2025 reinforce a clear truth: fast-charging demand concentrates where EV markets are mature, home charging is constrained or insufficient for daily life, and high-utilization driving is common.

These hotspots are a preview of where other metros are headed as adoption deepens. For planners, investors, and operators, they’re also a reminder that sessions reflect lived charging behavior—the mix of density, housing type, mobility patterns, and local infrastructure that determines when drivers choose public DCFC over plugging in at home.

If you’re tracking where to build next—or how demand is shifting—watch these ZIP codes. They’re not just busy. They’re predictive.